Rejected twice, and the second notice said the same thing as the first.
- Dyvertex
- Services
- Mobile development
- App Store rejection
Store review
App Store rejection, read and answered.
Guideline 4.3, 5.1.1, 2.1 Performance, a missing purpose string, a Play data safety mismatch. We read the actual rejection, fix the actual cause, and write the reply to App Review.
- commit
- native build
- test build
- store review
- staged rollout
- someone's phone
Five working days is our time. The review queue is Apple's, and nobody sells you that.
You are probably here because
If none of these sound like your app, the free call is still the fastest way to find out what does.
The reviewer cannot get past sign-in, and nobody on the team can reproduce it.
Play Console flagged the data safety form against what your SDKs actually collect.
Launch is Thursday and the binary has been In Review since Monday.
What the five days cover
Fixed scope, fixed price, agreed before anyone writes code. If something outside this turns out to matter more, we re-scope in the open instead of quietly billing for it.
- Rejection triage
- The guideline cited, what it means in practice, and which cause applies to your build. Most rejections are one of a short list, and the notice rarely names it directly.
- Fixing the cause
- Purpose strings, in-app account deletion, sign-in options, ATT prompts, subscription disclosure, privacy manifest and required-reason APIs, third-party SDK signatures. Whatever the notice is actually about.
- Reviewer access
- A demo account that works, seeded test data, and a walkthrough note, so review stops failing at the login screen and starts looking at the app.
- The reply
- A response to App Review written to be read by a person under time pressure: what changed, where to find it, and why the guideline is met now.
- Resubmission
- New build, corrected listing metadata and screenshots, submitted and watched until it clears, with the next step ready if it does not.
- Play Console
- The same treatment on the Android side: data safety, target API level, and permissions declarations. Google's closed testing requirement for new personal accounts is 12 testers over 14 days, which is their clock, not ours, so it sits outside the five days.
Price
One number, agreed before we start.
If the rejection turns out to be a symptom of something structural, we say so before spending your five days on a patch.
We have shipped our own products to real users: Mira on the iOS App Store and ariex.fit in public beta. There are no rescue case studies in the portfolio yet, and we are not going to claim there are some under NDA.
Store review
Audit & Fix
The guideline read, the cause fixed, the reply written.
Start with the free callQuestions we get asked first.
Anything not answered here is worth twenty minutes on a call.
How fast can you turn a rejection around?
The fix is usually done in one to three days. What we cannot compress is Apple's review queue, which currently runs about a day for most submissions but is not a promise anyone can make on Apple's behalf.
Can you guarantee approval?
No, and anyone who does is selling you something. Review is a human decision against guidelines that get interpreted. What we can do is remove the cause that was cited, make the app easy to review, and answer clearly. That is what moves the outcome.
What if the rejection is 4.3 Spam or Design?
4.3 is the hard one, because it is about your app looking like other apps rather than about a specific bug. It usually needs product changes, not code changes, and it is sometimes an account-level pattern rather than a build problem. We will tell you honestly which of those it looks like before you pay for a fix that cannot work.
Do you handle Google Play as well?
Yes. Data safety declarations, target API level, sensitive permission justifications, and the closed testing requirement for new personal developer accounts.
What if the app was removed, not rejected?
A removal is a different process and often an account-level one. We can help you read what happened and prepare the appeal, but we are honest that the outcome is less predictable than a build rejection.
Book the audit
Want a straight answer on this one?
Send the repo, the rejection notice, or just the idea. Twenty minutes is enough to tell you whether a rescue, a rebuild, or a clean no is the right next step.
Prefer email? [email protected]