Volodymyr Zakhovaiko
Founder, CTOArchitecture, code, estimates, and every free call. He signs the contracts and makes the call on technical risk, which means the person who quotes your project is the person who builds it.
About us
Dyvertex is a small studio in Poland. We build products from scratch and we take AI-built prototypes to production. Before we sold either of those, we did both for ourselves, and the two apps that came out of it are the only case studies on this site.
From the founder
I started writing code as a kid, long before I knew it was something people got paid for. Nothing else held my attention in the same way, and it led me to a computer science degree.
University gave me the part I'd been missing, which was how a product actually works: who it is for, what it has to survive, and why most of the decisions that matter are made before anyone opens an editor. Then a first job as a developer, where I shipped a lot, grew quickly, and learned what a codebase looks like when the people writing it are under pressure.
After a few years of that, the interesting problems were all on someone else's roadmap, and I wanted to build something of my own. I didn't plan what came next. Along the way I kept meeting people with good ideas, and helping them get there was the work I liked more than anything else I'd done. It was never only about the code. I liked being close to someone building something they care about, and growing alongside it.
That is what this is. We build our own products, and we help other people build theirs.
Volodymyr Zakhovaiko, Founder
Why this exists
Lovable, Bolt, Replit and Base44 are genuinely good at getting a founder to something that runs. What they are not good at is the part nobody sees in the demo: who is allowed to read that row, what happens on the second deploy, where the keys are stored, and what the database does when a thousand people arrive instead of three. Products tend to fail in that gap, and that's where we work.
We're not against those tools. We use AI heavily ourselves, and we're open about it. The difference is that a senior engineer reviews every change we ship and decides whether it is correct.
So we started the way we would want a studio to start: by building and releasing our own products, with our own money and our own deadlines, and putting them somewhere public where anyone can go and look.
Our story
The steps that led to the studio, and the products that came out of it. Everything at the end of this list is public, so you can check it yourself.
I started writing code as a kid, with no idea it was something people got paid for. It held my attention longer than anything else did, and it never really stopped.
Lectures filled in what code alone didn't teach me, mostly about who a product is for and what it has to survive.
I shipped a lot, took on more than my title said I should, and grew fast. It was a good few years, and it taught me what a codebase looks like when the people writing it are under pressure.
At some point the interesting problems were all on someone else's roadmap. I wanted to be the one deciding what got built and why. It's a less comfortable spot, and I'd still pick it every time.
This is the part I did not plan. I kept meeting founders with genuinely good products, and helping them get there turned out to be the work I liked most. It was never only about the code. It was being close to someone building something they care about, and growing alongside it.
Mira, a React Native photo journal for mindfulness, which Daria took from the first commit to a released App Store app. It is now at v1.1. And ariex.fit, AI fitness coaching in React Native and Expo, built end to end: the model work, the backend, the mobile client and the deployment. Mermlaid, our developer tool, is open source alongside them.
Volodymyr Zakhovaiko Strategic Partner, a sole proprietorship registered in Poland, trading as Dyvertex. Three fixed-price offers, a scope agreed in writing before anything starts, and your code in your repository from day one.
The team
You work directly with the people who build your product. Nobody translates your requirements into tickets on the way.
Architecture, code, estimates, and every free call. He signs the contracts and makes the call on technical risk, which means the person who quotes your project is the person who builds it.
Development, QA and delivery. She took Mira from the first commit to a released App Store app, so the quality bar on the client work is a bar she has already cleared on our own product.
First point of contact and qualification. He assesses whether we are the right team for your project. The technical discussion, scope and price are handled by Volodymyr.
How we work
We agree the scope and the number before anything starts. If the work turns out not to fit the number, we should have said so earlier. That risk is ours, and it is never passed on to you halfway through the project.
We use AI tools deliberately and are open about it. A senior engineer reviews every AI-assisted change before it ships.
We have not yet published client case studies, and we do not claim that any exist under NDA. Instead, we show our own products and our own code.
Your code lives in your repository from day one, the accounts are in your name, and the handoff package is written into the contract. You are never locked in.
When we are not the right fit
It is better to state this upfront than to discover it in the second week of a project.
Large multi-team enterprise platforms. Staff augmentation, where a developer is assigned to your project for months at a time. Maintaining someone else's legacy system without rewriting it. Anything where the request is to work around security, GDPR, or another company's terms of service.
A recommendation not to proceed is a legitimate outcome of the consultation. You will hear it within the 20 minutes, before you have paid anything.
Free consultation · 20 minutes
Bring your idea, prototype or the issue that keeps recurring. You will leave with the main production risk identified and a clear next step, whether or not it involves us.
Prefer email? [email protected]