dyvertexVolodymyr Zakhovaiko
Founder, CTOArchitecture, code, estimates, and every audit call. He signs the contracts and he owns the technical risk decisions, which means the person who quotes your project is the person who builds it.
- Dyvertex
- About
Who is behind this
We shipped our own products first.
Dyvertex is a small studio in Poland. We build products from scratch and we take AI-built prototypes to production. Before we sold either of those, we did both for ourselves, and the two apps that came out of it are the only case studies on this site.
From the founder
I did not set out to run a studio.
I started writing code as a kid, long before I knew it was something people got paid for. It was simply the most interesting thing in the room, and it held my attention long enough to turn into a computer science degree.
University gave me the part I had been missing. Not more syntax, but how a product actually works: who it is for, what it has to survive, and why most of the decisions that matter are made before anyone opens an editor. Then a first job as a developer, where I shipped a lot, grew quickly, and learned what a codebase looks like when the people writing it are under pressure.
After a few years of that, the interesting problems were all on someone else’s roadmap, and I wanted to build something of my own. What I did not plan is the part that turned out to matter most. Along the way I kept meeting people with genuinely good ideas, and helping them get there was the work I liked more than anything else I had done. Not just writing the code. Being close to someone building something they care about, and growing alongside it.
That is what this is. We build our own products, and we help other people build theirs.
Volodymyr Zakhovaiko, Founder
Why this exists
The demo was never the hard part.
Lovable, Bolt, Replit and Base44 are genuinely good at getting a founder to something that runs. What they are not good at is the part nobody sees in the demo: who is allowed to read that row, what happens on the second deploy, where the keys are stored, and what the database does when a thousand people arrive instead of three. That gap is where products die, and it is the gap we work in.
We are not against those tools. We use AI heavily ourselves, and we are open about it. The difference is that every change we ship has a senior engineer behind it who decided it was correct. That review step is not a formality wrapped around the work, it is the work.
So we started the way we would want a studio to start: by building and releasing our own products, with our own money and our own deadlines, and putting them somewhere public where anyone can go and look.
How we got here
The long version, in order.
The stages that led to a studio, and the products that came out of it. Everything at the end of this list is public and you can go and check it.
- Long before it was a job
Programming was just the interesting thing in the room
I started writing code as a kid, with no idea it was something people got paid for. It held my attention longer than anything else did, and it never really stopped.
- University
A computer science degree, and the part code does not teach
The degree gave me the thing I had been missing. Not more syntax, but how a product actually works: who it is for, what it has to survive, and why most of the decisions that matter are made before anyone opens an editor.
- First job
Hired as a developer, and moving quickly
I shipped a lot, took on more than my title said I should, and grew fast. It was a good few years, and it taught me what a codebase looks like when the people writing it are under pressure.
- The itch
Wanting to build something of my own
At some point the interesting problems were all on someone else’s roadmap. I wanted to be the one deciding what got built and why, which is a much less comfortable position and a far better one.
- Along the way
Meeting people with ideas worth building
This is the part I did not plan. I kept meeting founders with genuinely good products, and helping them get there turned out to be the work I liked most. Not just writing the code, but being close to someone building something they care about and growing alongside it.
- 2026
Two products of our own, in public
Mira, a React Native mindful photo-journal, taken by Daria from the first commit to a released App Store app, now at v1.1. And ariex.fit, AI fitness coaching in React Native and Expo, built end to end: the model work, the backend, the mobile client and the deployment. Mermlaid, our developer tool, is open source alongside them.
- Now
Dyvertex takes client work
Volodymyr Zakhovaiko Strategic Partner, a sole proprietorship registered in Poland, trading as Dyvertex. Three fixed-price offers, a scope agreed in writing before anything starts, and your code in your repository from day one.
The team
Three people, no account managers.
You talk to the people who build the thing. There is nobody in the middle translating what you said into a ticket.
Daria Karpovich
Co-founder, DeliveryDevelopment, QA and delivery. She took Mira from the first commit to a released App Store app, so the quality bar on the client work is a bar she has already cleared on our own product.
Illia Hrebenko
Growth LeadFirst contact and qualification. He is the one who works out whether we are the right team for you at all. The technical conversation, the scope and the price come from Volodymyr.
How we work
Four things we do not bend on.
A fixed price, or an honest no
The scope and the number are agreed before anything starts. If the work does not fit the number, that is our problem to have said so earlier, not yours to absorb halfway through.
AI writes code, a senior reviews it
We use AI tools deliberately and we say so out loud. Every AI-assisted change goes through senior human review before it ships. That review step is not overhead around the business, it is the business.
No invented case studies
We have no rescue case studies published yet and we will not pretend otherwise, including the convenient version where they exist but are under NDA. What we show instead is our own products and our own code.
You can leave at any point
Your code lives in your repository from day one, the accounts are in your name, and the handoff package is written into the contract. Nothing here depends on you being unable to go elsewhere.
Where we are the wrong call
What we turn down.
Saying this on our own site is cheaper for both of us than finding it out in week two.
Large multi-team enterprise platforms. Staffing arrangements where you want a developer parked on your project for six months. Maintaining someone else’s legacy system without rewriting it. Anything where the request is to work around security, GDPR, or another company’s terms of service.
A clean no is a legitimate outcome of the audit call, and it happens. You will get it in the twenty minutes, before you have paid us anything.
Book the audit
Twenty minutes, and you will know what your product actually needs.
Bring the idea, the prototype, or the thing that keeps breaking. You leave with the biggest production risk named and a clear next step, whether or not that step is us.
Prefer email? [email protected]